Kuroma Kuroma

jasper.ai scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

Put AI agents to work for marketing (jasper.ai) is a AI / Machine Learning site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is AI Readiness (45); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 19/100 (1 of 165 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 479 AI / Machine Learning sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://jasper.ai

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AI / Machine Learning Median 49 · Top quartile 56 · across 479 audited sites in AI / Machine Learning

Is jasper.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: jasper.ai scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Improve Unique Value Proposition and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 76
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 63
AI Readiness 30% of the score 45

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://jasper.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts

    On https://jasper.ai · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.1 pts

    On https://jasper.ai · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 19/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://jasper.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.8 pts

    On https://jasper.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 46/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1977 words, 104 paragraphs, 19 lists, 62 images (42 with alt text)

    • 20 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 78/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 7 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, FAQPage, SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Pass 83/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 21. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 53/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 20 of 62 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 10 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Morningstar logo", "HarperCollins logo", "Prudential logo").
    • 36 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 62 images but only ~1977 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    19 render-blocking resources. 2907 elements for 1977 words

    • 19 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 33 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 86/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 46/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 88/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 80/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 31 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 19/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 165 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 64/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 64/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1977 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AI / Machine Learning sites

Other AI / Machine Learning sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.