Kuroma Kuroma

www.ntt-f.co.jp scores 53/100 for AI Readiness

www.ntt-f.co.jp is a architecture site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 53/100 (grade B), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (83) and its weakest is Authority Signals (38); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 7/100 (2 of 413 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 770 Real Estate sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.ntt-f.co.jp

53/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 35/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Top 25% in Real Estate Median 39 · Top quartile 44 · across 770 audited sites in Real Estate

Is www.ntt-f.co.jp ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: www.ntt-f.co.jp scores 53/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 83
Authority Signals 25% of the score 38
AI Readiness 30% of the score 44

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add Trust Signals up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.ntt-f.co.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 35/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.ntt-f.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.ntt-f.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.7 pts

    On https://www.ntt-f.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 7/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://www.ntt-f.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 35/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 4,555 words, 23 paragraphs, 45 lists, 255 images (44 with alt text)

    • 211 images missing alt text (e.g. /common/images/megamenu/megamenu_photo_info.jpg, /common/images/megamenu/megamenu_photo_info.jpg, /common/images/megamenu/megamenu_photo_people.jpg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 39/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 10, H3: 51. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Fail 24/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 211 of 255 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("NTT Facilities", "NTT Facilities", "NTT Facilities").
    • 230 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 255 images but only ~4,555 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 3,907 elements for 4,555 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 234 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 88/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Legal notice, Contact

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 53/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 66 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 69/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/3/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 7/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 413 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited architecture sites