Kuroma Kuroma

rezi.ai scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

The #1 AI Resume Builder (rezi.ai) is a HR Tech / Recruitment site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (78) and its weakest is AI Readiness (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 207 HR Tech / Recruitment sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://rezi.ai

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 18/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 4.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in HR Tech / Recruitment Median 41 · Top quartile 49 · across 207 audited sites in HR Tech / Recruitment

Is rezi.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: rezi.ai scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 78
Authority Signals 25% of the score 70
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +4.7 pts

    On https://rezi.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 18/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://rezi.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://rezi.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.8 pts

    On https://rezi.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 60/100

    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://rezi.ai · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 75/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2799 words, 259 paragraphs, 100 images (74 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 26 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 11 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, SoftwareApplication, WebApplication, Organization, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 12 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 93/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 13, H3: 44. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 26 of 100 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 50 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("HubSpot", "HubSpot", "Google").
    • 84 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 100 images but only ~2799 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    8 render-blocking resources. 4159 elements for 2799 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 9 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 15 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 15 of 196 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 60/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 4/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    46 external links, 0 citation phrases, 23 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 81/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    35 of 58 headings open a quotable passage, 5 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 18/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 57/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    12 of 152 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 70/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2799 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited HR Tech / Recruitment sites

Other HR Tech / Recruitment sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.