Kuroma Kuroma

swssglobal.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

swssglobal.com is a Chemicals site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (77) and its weakest is AI Readiness (53); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 16/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://swssglobal.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 16/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 5.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is swssglobal.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: swssglobal.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 56
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 73
AI Readiness 30% of the score 53

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.5 pts

    On https://swssglobal.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 16/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://swssglobal.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.1 pts

    On https://swssglobal.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 32/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.1 pts

    On https://swssglobal.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 57/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 1 of your 27 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://swssglobal.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 98/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1826 words, 32 paragraphs, 10 lists, 5 tables, 102 images (22 with alt text)

    • 80 images missing alt text (e.g. //swssglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/SWGO-Slide.png, //swssglobal.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/assets/assets/transparent.png, //swssglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EcoVadis-Platinum-…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 16/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 32/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 99/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 64/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 6, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 22/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 80 of 102 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 10 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Avatar", "Avatar", "Avatar").
    • 61 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 102 images but only ~1826 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3931ms). 21 render-blocking resources. 1171 elements for 1826 words

    • Server response was slow (3931ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 21 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 4 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 141 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Pass 80/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 25/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    18 external links, 0 citation phrases, 10 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 71/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (6)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 57/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 27 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 5 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 10 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 69/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 53/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 141 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 5 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 47/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 47/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1826 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other Chemicals sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.