Kuroma
nogood.io scores 67/100 for AI Readiness
nogood.io is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is AI Readiness (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 9/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,605 Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://nogood.io
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.
This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Professional Services Median 40 · Top quartile 47 · across 1,605 audited sites in Professional Services
Is nogood.io ready for AI search?
Largely yes: nogood.io scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts
On https://nogood.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts
On https://nogood.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://nogood.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.5 pts
On https://nogood.io · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 31/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
-
Add Trust Signals up to +3.1 pts
On https://nogood.io · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 66/100
- Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 2307 words, 55 paragraphs, 15 lists, 53 images (36 with alt text)
- 17 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 10 question headings. 4 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization
-
3% of the overall score
Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 5 of 22 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- 2 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
2 render-blocking resources. 1217 elements for 2307 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 1 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links
- 9 of 178 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 11/25. Trust: 17/25. Has author
-
9% of the overall score
5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 6 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
14 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 8/13/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
3 of 113 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 79/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
2307 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Consulting / Professional Services sites
- AI Development Company & Engineering Partner (groovyweb.co) · 75/100
- Business Setup in Dubai & UAE Company Formation (dubaistartbusiness.com) · 71/100
- indapoint.com · 69/100
- Truvisory® (truvisory.com) · 69/100
- NexSphere (nexsphere.in) · 69/100
- Software Development Outsourcing Company (qarea.com) · 69/100
Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.