Kuroma Kuroma

nogood.io scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

nogood.io is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is AI Readiness (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 9/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization). That places it in the top quartile of the 1601 Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://nogood.io

67/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Professional Services Median 40 · Top quartile 47 · across 1601 audited sites in Professional Services

Is nogood.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: nogood.io scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 68
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 87
Authority Signals 25% of the score 63
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://nogood.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://nogood.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://nogood.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.5 pts

    On https://nogood.io · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 31/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +3.1 pts

    On https://nogood.io · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 66/100

    • Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2307 words, 55 paragraphs, 15 lists, 53 images (36 with alt text)

    • 17 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 73/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 10 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 59/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 22 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 2 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 1217 elements for 2307 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 178 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 71/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 11/25. Trust: 17/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 6 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 73/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/13/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 31/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 113 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 79/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 79/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2307 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Consulting / Professional Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai