Kuroma Kuroma

teamwork.com scores 71/100 for AI Readiness

AI-Powered PSA Software Built for Profitability (teamwork.com) is a SaaS / Cloud Software site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 71/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (90) and its weakest is AI Readiness (59); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 0/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it in the top quartile of the 188 SaaS / Cloud Software sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://teamwork.com

71/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in SaaS / Cloud Software Median 47 · Top quartile 54 · across 188 audited sites in SaaS / Cloud Software

Is teamwork.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: teamwork.com scores 71/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 72
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 90
Authority Signals 25% of the score 70
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://teamwork.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://teamwork.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts

    On https://teamwork.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +2.9 pts

    On https://teamwork.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 49/100

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +2.3 pts

    On https://teamwork.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 70/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3371 words, 102 paragraphs, 4 lists, 101 images (19 with alt text)

    • 82 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 84/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 7 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    7 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Product, Organization, WebSite, WebPage, SoftwareApplication, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, VideoObject

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 20. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 50/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 82 of 101 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Teamwork.com", "Teamwork.com").
    • 36 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 101 images but only ~3371 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    7 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 75/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3389ms). 0 render-blocking resources. 1608 elements for 3371 words

    • Server response was slow (3389ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 92 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 68/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 7/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 86/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 86/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 49/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/5/2023

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 164 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3371 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for SaaS / Cloud Software · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai