Kuroma Kuroma

acquia.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness

Digital Experience Platform for Content, Community, Commerce (acquia.com) is a SaaS / Cloud Software site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (77) and its weakest is AI Readiness (59); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 30/100 (0 original data indicators, 13 percentages, 0 quotes.). That places it in the top quartile of the 168 SaaS / Cloud Software sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://acquia.com

69/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in SaaS / Cloud Software Median 47 · Top quartile 54 · across 168 audited sites in SaaS / Cloud Software

Is acquia.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: acquia.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Increase Citation-Worthy Content and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 77
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 71
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://acquia.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://acquia.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 30 of 284 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 87 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.6 pts

    On https://acquia.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 30/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.7 pts

    On https://acquia.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 39/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://acquia.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2587 words, 36 paragraphs, 97 lists, 6 tables, 83 images (28 with alt text)

    • 55 images missing alt text (e.g. /sites/default/files/media/image/2026-04/Side%204.svg, /sites/default/files/media/image/2026-04/Side%202.svg, /sites/default/files/media/image/2026-04/Side%201.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 3 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 39/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 8. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 36/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 55 of 83 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Home", "TV Icon", "bayer logo").
    • 13 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 83 images but only ~2587 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    12 render-blocking resources. 2314 elements for 2587 words

    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 9 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 30 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 30 of 284 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 66/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    28 external links, 0 citation phrases, 13 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 96/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 22 headings open a quotable passage, 6 definitions, 6 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 13 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 59/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 4/24/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 30/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 200 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2587 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for SaaS / Cloud Software · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai