Kuroma Kuroma

focustaiwan.tw scores 52/100 for AI Readiness

Focus Taiwan (focustaiwan.tw) is a Publishing / News Media site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 52/100 (grade B), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (68) and its weakest is AI Readiness (42); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 850 Publishing / News Media sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://focustaiwan.tw

52/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Publishing / News Media Median 40 · Top quartile 45 · across 850 audited sites in Publishing / News Media

Is focustaiwan.tw ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: focustaiwan.tw scores 52/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve AI Discoverability.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 49
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 68
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 42

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://focustaiwan.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://focustaiwan.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 19 of 236 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at focustaiwan.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 71 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at focustaiwan.tw — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +5.1 pts

    On https://focustaiwan.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 29/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 2 of your 61 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://focustaiwan.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://focustaiwan.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1602 words, 23 lists, 30 images (30 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 38/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 9 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 77/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 21, H3: 39. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 63/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Tradition endures", "Coming through!", "Rising stars").
    • 30 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 29 image(s) load only via JavaScript (lazy/data-src), and most AI crawlers run no JavaScript and never see them.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 949 elements for 1602 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 30 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 19 placeholder links

    • 19 of 236 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at focustaiwan.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 48/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 23 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 64/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 29/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 61 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 84/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    22 of 135 passages carry a figure, 11 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 0/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 0/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1602 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Publishing / News Media sites

Other Publishing / News Media sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.