Kuroma Kuroma

ledger.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

Ledger Crypto Wallet (ledger.com) is a Crypto / Blockchain site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (55); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 19/100 (2 of 136 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://ledger.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 20/100 on a check worth 6.7% of the total, which takes 5.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is ledger.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: ledger.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 74
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 55
AI Readiness 30% of the score 55

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +5.4 pts

    On https://ledger.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://ledger.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://ledger.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.1 pts

    On https://ledger.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 19/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4 pts

    On https://ledger.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 43/100

    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 2700 words, 176 paragraphs, 37 lists, 114 images (34 with alt text)

    • 80 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 1 question headings. 7 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, ItemList, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 98/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 80 of 114 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 28 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Ledger", "Ledger Stax™", "Ledger Flex™").
    • 30 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 114 images but only ~2700 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    26 render-blocking resources. 1916 elements for 2700 words

    • 26 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 6 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 of 272 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 43/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 14/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (6)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 81/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 5 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 8/3/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 19/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 136 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 69/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2700 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Crypto / Blockchain sites

Other Crypto / Blockchain sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.