Kuroma Kuroma

getcode.one scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

GetCode (getcode.one) is a Crypto / Blockchain site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is AI Readiness (53); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 30/100 (No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,120 Finance & Insurance sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://getcode.one

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 36/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Finance & Insurance Median 39 · Top quartile 47 · across 1,120 audited sites in Finance & Insurance

Is getcode.one ready for AI search?

Largely yes: getcode.one scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 59
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 87
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 53

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.5 pts

    On https://getcode.one · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 36/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://getcode.one · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://getcode.one · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://getcode.one · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts

    On https://getcode.one · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 33/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of

The 18 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 78/100

    7% of the overall score

    Found: 1858 words, 53 paragraphs, 9 lists, 1 tables

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 36/100

    7% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 33/100

    4.8% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3.2% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    3% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 13, H3: 15. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3051ms). 3 render-blocking resources. 1459 elements for 1858 words

    • Server response was slow (3051ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • 2 of 73 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: ChatGPT-User blocked in robots.txt. These tokens cover on-demand user fetches and platforms may not apply robots.txt to those requests; reported for information, not scored.
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, Google-Extended, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 54/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 11 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 94/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 74/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    12 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    8 of 173 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 73/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 73/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1858 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Crypto / Blockchain sites

Other Crypto / Blockchain sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.