Kuroma Kuroma

lokd.io scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

LOKD (lokd.io) is a Crypto / Blockchain site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (76) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,120 Finance & Insurance sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://lokd.io

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Finance & Insurance Median 39 · Top quartile 47 · across 1,120 audited sites in Finance & Insurance

Is lokd.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: lokd.io scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Increase Citation-Worthy Content and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 76
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 65
Authority Signals 25% of the score 63
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://lokd.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.7 pts

    On https://lokd.io · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 56/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 84 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 22 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.5 pts

    On https://lokd.io · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 11/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.2 pts

    On https://lokd.io · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 40/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +3.8 pts

    On https://lokd.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 58/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1600 words, 44 paragraphs, 4 lists, 1 tables, 32 images (32 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 3 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    6 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, VideoObject, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 14 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 10. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 62/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 25 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("LOKD", "LOKD", "Luzerner Zeitung").
    • 24 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    6 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    8 render-blocking resources. 1462 elements for 1600 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 56/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 84 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 40/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 58/100

    9% of the overall score

    26 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 86/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 96/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 5 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 11/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 104 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1600 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Crypto / Blockchain sites

Other Crypto / Blockchain sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.