Kuroma
future-marketing.ai scores 69/100 for AI Readiness
FutureMarketingAI (future-marketing.ai) is a MarTech / Marketing Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (86) and its weakest is Authority Signals (50); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 28/100 (No author attribution found). That places it in the top quartile of the 506 Marketing & Sales sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://future-marketing.ai
The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 35/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Marketing & Sales Median 47.5 · Top quartile 56 · across 506 audited sites in Marketing & Sales
Is future-marketing.ai ready for AI search?
Largely yes: future-marketing.ai scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts
On https://future-marketing.ai · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts
On https://future-marketing.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 28/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts
On https://future-marketing.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3 pts
On https://future-marketing.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 33/100
- Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +2.4 pts
On https://future-marketing.ai · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 52/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1608 words, 101 paragraphs, 8 lists, 1 tables, 4 images (4 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 12 question headings. 2 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, ProfessionalService, WebSite, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 28. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
3 render-blocking resources. 1761 elements for 1608 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 4 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 14 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (1)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
16 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 10 percentages, 3 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References last year. Last modified: 8/11/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
9 of 185 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 85/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1608 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited MarTech / Marketing Platform sites
- GoDaddy Official Site (godaddy.com) · 72/100
- Moz (moz.com) · 68/100
- LLM Pulse (llmpulse.ai) · 68/100
- 戰國策集團 (nss.com.tw) · 67/100
- Google SEO 與 AI Search 優化專家 (welly.tw) · 67/100
- Whatfix (whatfix.com) · 67/100
Other MarTech / Marketing Platform sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.