nss.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 67/100
戰國策集團 (nss.com.tw) 是 行銷科技/行銷平台 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 67/100(A 級),檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術(82 分),最弱的是權威性(56 分);最大的單一缺口是獨特價值主張,24/100(3 of 464 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 201 個 行銷科技/行銷平台 類網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://nss.com.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是 E-E-A-T 訊號:這項占總分 7%,只拿到 35/100,讓總分少了 4.6 分。
這次檢測距今已 45 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在 行銷科技/行銷平台 類別中排前 25% 中位數 49 · 前四分之一門檻 56 · 樣本為 201 個受測網站(行銷科技/行銷平台 類別)
nss.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
大致準備好了:nss.com.tw 的實測分數為 67/100(A 級)。 剩下要補的是 Improve Unique Value Proposition、Improve Page Performance Indicators。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +4.6 分
位於 https://nss.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 35/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +4.1 分
位於 https://nss.com.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +3.9 分
位於 https://nss.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 24/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +3.1 分
位於 https://nss.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 57/100
- 29 of your 118 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
- Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
- Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +2.9 分
位於 https://nss.com.tw · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 56/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 5440 words, 66 paragraphs, 135 lists, 193 images (184 with alt text)
- 9 images missing alt text (e.g. /wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Facebook-icon.png, /wp-content/uploads/2018/10/YouTube-icon.png, /wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Line-icon.png)
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
占總分 4.5%
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Place, LocalBusiness, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Article, VideoObject
-
占總分 3%
Average 11 words/sentence. 23 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 98. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 9 of 193 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("中興大學", "ovo", "亞洲航空").
- 165 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 193 images but only ~5440 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
Fetch succeeded but was slow (9487ms). 278 render-blocking resources. 5109 elements for 5440 words
- Server response was slow (9487ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
- 278 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 104 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 33 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 33 of 626 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
-
占總分 9%
46 external links, 0 citation phrases, 8 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (8)
- No privacy policy link found
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
29 of 118 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 10 quotes.
-
占總分 5.7%
No recent year references. Last modified: 7/11/2026
- No recent year references in content
-
占總分 5.1%
3 of 464 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
-
占總分 3%
Score: 49/100
-
占總分 1.5%
5440 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單其他 行銷科技/行銷平台 類網站的成績單
- GoDaddy Official Site (godaddy.com) · 72/100
- FutureMarketingAI (future-marketing.ai) · 69/100
- Moz (moz.com) · 68/100
- LLM Pulse (llmpulse.ai) · 68/100
- Google SEO 與 AI Search 優化專家 (welly.tw) · 67/100
- Whatfix (whatfix.com) · 67/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 行銷科技/行銷平台 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。