Kuroma Kuroma

nss.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 67/100

戰國策集團｜雲端服務、網頁設計與SEO行銷戰國策集團專業服務 (nss.com.tw) 是 MarTech / Marketing Platform 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 67/100（A 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（82 分），最弱的是權威性（56 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Unique Value Proposition，24/100（3 of 464 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 202 個 MarTech / Marketing Platform 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://nss.com.tw

67/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in MarTech / Marketing Platform Median 49 · Top quartile 56 · across 202 audited sites in MarTech / Marketing Platform

nss.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致準備好了：nss.com.tw 的實測分數為 67/100（A 級）。 剩下要補的是 Improve Unique Value Proposition、Improve Page Performance Indicators。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 74
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 60

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://nss.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 35/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://nss.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.9 pts

    On https://nss.com.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 24/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.1 pts

    On https://nss.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 57/100

    • 29 of your 118 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +2.9 pts

    On https://nss.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 56/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 5440 words, 66 paragraphs, 135 lists, 193 images (184 with alt text)

    • 9 images missing alt text (e.g. /wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Facebook-icon.png, /wp-content/uploads/2018/10/YouTube-icon.png, /wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Line-icon.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 56/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Place, LocalBusiness, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Article, VideoObject

  • AI Readability Score Pass 93/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 23 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 90/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 98. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 67/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 9 of 193 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("中興大學", "ovo", "亞洲航空").
    • 165 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 193 images but only ~5440 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (9487ms). 278 render-blocking resources. 5109 elements for 5440 words

    • Server response was slow (9487ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 278 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 104 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 33 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 33 of 626 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    46 external links, 0 citation phrases, 8 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 74/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (8)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 57/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    29 of 118 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 84/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 10 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 7/11/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 24/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 464 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 49/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 49/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    5440 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for MarTech / Marketing Platform · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai