Kuroma Kuroma

fdcp.co.jp scores 55/100 for AI Readiness

fdcp.co.jp is a DTC / Consumer Brands site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 55/100 (grade B), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is AI Readiness (40); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 5/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it in the top quartile of the 850 DTC / Consumer Brands sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://fdcp.co.jp

55/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 5.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in DTC / Consumer Brands Median 38 · Top quartile 44 · across 850 audited sites in DTC / Consumer Brands

Is fdcp.co.jp ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: fdcp.co.jp scores 55/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 60
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 48
AI Readiness 30% of the score 40

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://fdcp.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 22/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.3 pts

    On https://fdcp.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 18/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.8 pts

    On https://fdcp.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 5/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4.6 pts

    On https://fdcp.co.jp · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 36/100

    • 1 of your 14 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://fdcp.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2,039 words, 237 paragraphs, 112 lists, 6 tables, 179 images (120 with alt text)

    • 59 images missing alt text (e.g. /Contents/ImagesPkg/logo/logo-4c.svg, /Contents/ImagesPkg/logo/logo-eau.svg, /Contents/ImagesPkg/logo/logo-cofl.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 18/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 7, H3: 7. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 30/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 59 of 179 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 86 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("[Official] 4℃", "[Official] 4℃", "4℃").
    • 145 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 179 images but only ~2,039 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    54 render-blocking resources. 3,375 elements for 2,039 words

    • 54 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 104 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 315 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 22/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    19 external links, 0 citation phrases, 82 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (3)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 36/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 14 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 10 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 48/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 54/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/14/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 111 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited DTC / Consumer Brands sites

Other DTC / Consumer Brands sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.