Kuroma Kuroma

ness.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

Ness Digital Engineering (ness.com) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is On-Page Content (58); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 1195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://ness.com

65/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is ness.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: ness.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 58
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 72
AI Readiness 30% of the score 58

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://ness.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.4 pts

    On https://ness.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 42/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://ness.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4 pts

    On https://ness.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 22/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.2 pts

    On https://ness.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 56/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 8 of your 53 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 89/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1913 words, 53 paragraphs, 6 lists, 66 images (32 with alt text)

    • 34 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 55/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 5 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 84/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 19, H3: 31. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 34 of 66 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Financial Services", "Retail", "Private Equity").
    • 46 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 66 images but only ~1913 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4682ms). 23 render-blocking resources. 1360 elements for 1913 words

    • Server response was slow (4682ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 23 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 177 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Pass 79/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 83/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 56/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 53 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/17/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 22/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 128 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 70/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1913 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Consulting / Professional Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai