Kuroma Kuroma

sendible.com scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

Sendible (sendible.com) is a Social Media Management site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (74) and its weakest is AI Readiness (55); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 16/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, OfferCatalog, WebPageElement, CreativeWork, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 272 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://sendible.com

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 68/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 4.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 272 audited sites in MarTech

Is sendible.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: sendible.com scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 74
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 70
Authority Signals 25% of the score 73
AI Readiness 30% of the score 55

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.2 pts

    On https://sendible.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 68/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 12 of 203 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 94 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://sendible.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts

    On https://sendible.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://sendible.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.8 pts

    On https://sendible.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 60/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3223 words, 142 paragraphs, 54 lists, 91 images (91 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 2 question headings. 6 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, OfferCatalog, WebPageElement, CreativeWork, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 90/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 28, H3: 3. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 46/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("REMAX_logo.svg", "REMAX_logo.svg", "image 13") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 80 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Sendible", "workspaces-switch-spaces-short", "workspaces-switch-spaces-short").
    • 35 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 91 images but only ~3223 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    44 render-blocking resources. 3061 elements for 3223 words

    • 44 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 36 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 68/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 12 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 12 of 203 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 60/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    36 external links, 0 citation phrases, 29 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (7)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 73/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 42 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 51/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    15 of 245 passages carry a figure, 4 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 56/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 56/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3223 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Social Media Management sites

Other Social Media Management sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.