cosme.net.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 50/100
化妝品使用心得及排行榜綜合網站@cosme (cosme.net.tw) 是 社群媒體經營 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 50/100(B 級),檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是AI 就緒度(58 分),最弱的是權威性(41 分);最大的單一缺口是標題階層,0/100(No headings a reader can see)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://cosme.net.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是答案框潛力:這項占總分 7.2%,只拿到 0/100,讓總分少了 7.2 分。
這次檢測距今已 25 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站
cosme.net.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
大致可以,仍有缺口:cosme.net.tw 的實測分數為 50/100(B 級)。 要補的缺口是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Optimize Heading Structure。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +7.2 分
位於 https://cosme.net.tw · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 0/100
- No passage an assistant could quote whole
- No FAQ structure detected
- Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
- Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
- Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +6.5 分
位於 https://cosme.net.tw · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 50/100
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 28 of 633 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at cosme.net.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
- Add lang attribute to HTML element
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Add Trust Signals 最多可 +6.3 分
位於 https://cosme.net.tw · 權威性 → 信任與品牌訊號, 得分 30/100
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +6.1 分
位於 https://cosme.net.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 13/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +5.3 分
位於 https://cosme.net.tw · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 19/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 5948 words, 3 paragraphs, 76 lists, 193 images (118 with alt text)
- 75 images missing alt text
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
占總分 4.5%
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite
-
占總分 3%
Average 18 words/sentence. 61 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.
- No headings a reader can see
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 76 of 193 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 32 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("DIOR 迪奧", "Logo20210407", "enfj").
- 145 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 193 images but only ~5948 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
11 render-blocking resources. 3310 elements for 5948 words
- 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 28 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 28 of 633 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at cosme.net.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
-
占總分 9%
12 external links, 3 citation phrases, 16 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: Privacy Policy, Testimonials, Social profiles (3)
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No passage an assistant could quote whole
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 2 quotes.
-
占總分 5.7%
References current year. Last modified: 6/3/2026
-
占總分 5.1%
13 of 174 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.
-
占總分 3%
Score: 27/100
-
占總分 1.5%
5948 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單其他 社群媒體經營 類網站的成績單
- Emplifi (emplifi.io) · 70/100
- Social Media Management Tool for Agencies (socialchamp.io) · 68/100
- Sendible (sendible.com) · 67/100
- Social Media Management Software (agorapulse.com) · 64/100
- 首頁 (ptt.cc) · 25/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 社群媒體經營 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。