Kuroma
icook.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 46/100
愛料理 (icook.tw) 是 社群媒體經營 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 46/100（C 級），檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 16 日。 表現最強的是技術（67 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（33 分）；最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質，0/100（No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,931 個網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://icook.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度：這項占總分 7.5%，只拿到 0/100，讓總分少了 7.5 分。
在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,931 個受測網站
icook.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？
部分準備好：icook.tw 的實測分數為 46/100（C 級）。 最該先做的兩件事是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。
類別分數
優先修正項目（依可挽回的分數排序）
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差，因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正，不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分
位於 https://icook.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +7 分
位於 https://icook.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 0/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.1 分
位於 https://icook.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 43/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +5.1 分
位於 https://icook.tw · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 29/100
- No FAQ structure detected
- 1 of your 57 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
- Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
- Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +4.6 分
位於 https://icook.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 10/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查，以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 828 words, 58 paragraphs, 14 lists, 38 images (38 with alt text)
- Content length (828 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
占總分 4.5%
3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: SoftwareApplication, Organization, WebSite
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 12 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
占總分 3%
Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 0, H2: 1, H3: 8. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 8 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("菱角", "秋葵", "大黃瓜").
- 35 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 38 images but only ~828 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
3 valid schemas, has Organization
-
占總分 2%
2 render-blocking resources. 856 elements for 828 words
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. 1 AI crawler(s) blocked: Claude-SearchBot. 4 placeholder links
- Meta robots noarchive/nocache directive detected. Bing documents that NOARCHIVE prevents content from being used in Copilot responses and grounding results.
- 4 of 169 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- 1 AI visibility crawler(s) blocked in robots.txt: Claude-SearchBot. Blocking these removes the site from the corresponding AI engines' answers.
- Informational: ChatGPT-User blocked in robots.txt. These tokens cover on-demand user fetches and platforms may not apply robots.txt to those requests; reported for information, not scored.
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
占總分 9%
25 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (3)
- No privacy policy link found
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
1 of 57 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
References current year. Last modified: 9/7/2026
-
占總分 5.1%
1 of 71 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
占總分 3%
Score: 67/100
-
占總分 1.5%
828 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度：AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡（提及、評論、第三方報導），而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌；Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單其他 社群媒體經營 類網站的成績單
- Emplifi (emplifi.io) · 70/100
- Social Media Management Tool for Agencies (socialchamp.io) · 68/100
- Sendible (sendible.com) · 67/100
- Social Media Management Software (agorapulse.com) · 64/100
- 化妝品使用心得及排行榜綜合網站@cosme (cosme.net.tw) · 50/100
- 首頁 (ptt.cc) · 25/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 社群媒體經營 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測；要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。