Kuroma Kuroma

singlegrain.com scores 68/100 for AI Readiness

Single Grain (singlegrain.com) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 68/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (78) and its weakest is On-Page Content (62); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 31 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 279 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://singlegrain.com

68/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 4.5% of the total, which takes 4.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 45 days ago

Top 25% in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 279 audited sites in MarTech

Is singlegrain.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: singlegrain.com scores 68/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 62
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 78
Authority Signals 25% of the score 64
AI Readiness 30% of the score 70

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://singlegrain.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 31 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://singlegrain.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://singlegrain.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.2 pts

    On https://singlegrain.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 55/100

    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Expand Question Coverage up to +2.7 pts

    On https://singlegrain.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 58/100

    • Add 5-10 question-based H2/H3 headings that mirror how users ask about this topic
    • Write a concise, direct answer under each question
    • Keep the questions in your FAQPage schema in sync with the on-page Q&A

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2817 words, 36 paragraphs, 31 lists, 104 images (83 with alt text)

    • 21 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 58/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 31 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 13. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 34/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 21 of 104 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 42 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("AI Implementation", "About Us", "Careers").
    • 47 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 1669 elements for 2817 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 79/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 42 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 42 of 339 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 55/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 4/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    83 external links, 0 citation phrases, 57 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 80/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 77/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    18 of 25 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 30 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 61/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 2/4/2026

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 90/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    36 of 240 passages carry a figure, 5 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2817 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Consulting / Professional Services sites

Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.