Kuroma Kuroma

konami.com scores 24/100 for AI Readiness

KONAMI (konami.com) is a Mental Health / Wellness site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 24/100 (grade F), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (54) and its weakest is AI Readiness (9); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 1,164 Healthcare & Life Sciences sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://konami.com

24/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 17/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 18 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 18 days ago

Below the median in Healthcare & Life Sciences Median 39 · Top quartile 46 · across 1,164 audited sites in Healthcare & Life Sciences

Is konami.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: konami.com scores 24/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 20
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 21
AI Readiness 30% of the score 9

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add Trust Signals up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.konami.com/ · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 17/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.konami.com/ · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +7.2 pts

    On https://www.konami.com/ · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +7 pts

    On https://www.konami.com/ · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://www.konami.com/ · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 9/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

The 18 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Fail 16/100

    7% of the overall score

    Found: 159 words, 1 lists

    • Content length (159 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.8% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3.2% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 1. Hierarchy issues.

    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 108 elements for 159 words

  • Mobile Optimization Needs work 45/100

    4% of the overall score

    Missing viewport

    • Missing viewport meta tag
  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 52/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable)

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • We could not fetch konami.com, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 9/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    18 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 17/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Contact, Social profiles (2)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 2 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 16/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 3/2/2015

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 6 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 21/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 21/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Partial 68/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    159 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Mental Health / Wellness sites

Other Mental Health / Wellness sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.