Kuroma Kuroma

eco-business.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

eco-business.com is a Publishing / News Media site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is Authority Signals (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found). That places it in the top quartile of the 850 Publishing / News Media sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://eco-business.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 55/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 4.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Publishing / News Media Median 40 · Top quartile 45 · across 850 audited sites in Publishing / News Media

Is eco-business.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: eco-business.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 64

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://eco-business.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.8 pts

    On https://eco-business.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 71/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 24 of 365 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Meta-ExternalAgent. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • robots.txt asks crawlers to wait 10s between requests, which limits how much of this site they reach
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://eco-business.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts

    On https://eco-business.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +3.5 pts

    On https://eco-business.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 61/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 92/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3249 words, 4 paragraphs, 29 lists, 74 images (68 with alt text)

    • 6 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), (inline image), (inline image))
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 71/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 12 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 83/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 61/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 74. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 of 74 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 23 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Eco-Business", "Eco-Business", "WeChat").
    • 52 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 74 images but only ~3249 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    5 render-blocking resources. 2266 elements for 3249 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 62 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 71/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 24 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 24 of 365 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Meta-ExternalAgent. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 51/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 7/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    23 external links, 0 citation phrases, 21 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 61/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 64/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    19 of 140 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 58/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    24 of 242 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3249 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Publishing / News Media sites

Other Publishing / News Media sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.