Kuroma Kuroma

oniongames.jp scores 47/100 for AI Readiness

Onion Games (oniongames.jp) is a Gaming site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 47/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is Authority Signals (33); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 787 Gaming sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://oniongames.jp

47/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Top 25% in Gaming Median 35 · Top quartile 40 · across 787 audited sites in Gaming

Is oniongames.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: oniongames.jp scores 47/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Optimize Mobile Experience.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 52
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 33
AI Readiness 30% of the score 36

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://oniongames.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://oniongames.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.7 pts

    On https://oniongames.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 19/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +5.1 pts

    On https://oniongames.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 43/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://oniongames.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 69/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 582 words, 27 paragraphs, 7 lists, 15 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (582 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 13 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 42/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 90/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 14 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 25/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 13 of 15 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Onion Games", "CONTACT US").
    • 15 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 15 images but only ~582 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    15 render-blocking resources. 265 elements for 582 words

    • 15 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 53/100

    4% of the overall score

    Missing viewport. 10 responsive images. has theme-color

    • Missing viewport meta tag
  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 79/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • 2 of 47 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 19/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Contact

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 54/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 5 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/9/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 22 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 27/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 27/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    582 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Gaming sites

Other Gaming sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.