Kuroma Kuroma

lili.co scores 70/100 for AI Readiness

Lili (lili.co) is a Banking / Neo-banking site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 70/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is On-Page Content (61); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 105 FinTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://lili.co

70/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in FinTech Median 51 · Top quartile 56 · across 105 audited sites in FinTech

Is lili.co ready for AI search?

Largely yes: lili.co scores 70/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 61
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 71
AI Readiness 30% of the score 67

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.2 pts

    On https://lili.co · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 36/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://lili.co · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://lili.co · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://lili.co · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +2 pts

    On https://lili.co · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 72/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 4569 words, 84 paragraphs, 10 lists, 150 images (150 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 36/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, FinancialService

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 10 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 91/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 46/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 8 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("image-1", "image-3", "image-4") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 128 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("home-hero_no card-scroll-v2", "trustpilot-final", "Frame 1000002798").
    • 141 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 150 images but only ~4569 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    34 render-blocking resources. 4430 elements for 4569 words

    • 34 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 7 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 89 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Pass 78/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 25/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 50 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 82/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 72/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 13 headings open a quotable passage, 8 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 17 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 70/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 94/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    33 of 259 passages carry a figure, 6 set two figures against each other, 12 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 77/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 77/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Banking / Neo-banking · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai