Kuroma Kuroma

adamosoft.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

AI & Software Development Company in Vietnam (adamosoft.com) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (57); the biggest single gap is Media Accessibility at 22/100 (106 of 155 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.). That places it in the top quartile of the 1195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://adamosoft.com

64/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is adamosoft.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: adamosoft.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make Media Machine-Readable to AI and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 64
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 62
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://adamosoft.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://adamosoft.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts

    On https://adamosoft.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.2 pts

    On https://adamosoft.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 55/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.1 pts

    On https://adamosoft.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 39/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2655 words, 117 paragraphs, 19 lists, 155 images (49 with alt text)

    • 106 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 72/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 1 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Organization, WebPage, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 29/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 20 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 24. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Fail 22/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 106 of 155 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 6 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("icon", "icon", "icon") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 22 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("close menu", "AI-ML-Development", "software-development-icon").
    • 46 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3437ms). 50 render-blocking resources. 1620 elements for 2655 words

    • Server response was slow (3437ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 50 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 4 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • 8 of 99 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 55/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 74/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 64/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 33 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/12/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 39/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 119 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 69/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2655 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Consulting / Professional Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai