Kuroma Kuroma

xberry.tech scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

xBerry (xberry.tech) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 22/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:). That places it in the top quartile of the 1195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://xberry.tech

65/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is xberry.tech ready for AI search?

Largely yes: xberry.tech scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 72
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 57
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts

    On https://xberry.tech · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://xberry.tech · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.6 pts

    On https://xberry.tech · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 29/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.5 pts

    On https://xberry.tech · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 22/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +3.4 pts

    On https://xberry.tech · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 62/100

    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 91/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1277 words, 37 paragraphs, 9 lists, 38 images (38 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 13 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 90/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 22. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 33 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("xBerry", "English", "Polish").
    • 13 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 38 images but only ~1277 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    80 render-blocking resources. 743 elements for 1277 words

    • 80 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 58 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 61/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 72/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 6/25/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 29/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 81 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 66/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 66/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1277 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Consulting / Professional Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai