Kuroma Kuroma

acibademinternational.com scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

Acibadem Hospitals Group (acibademinternational.com) is a Medical Devices site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 13/100 (4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: MedicalOrganization, WebSite, WebPage, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 190 Medical Devices sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://acibademinternational.com

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 58/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 5.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Medical Devices Median 38.5 · Top quartile 44 · across 190 audited sites in Medical Devices

Is acibademinternational.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: acibademinternational.com scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 79
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 64
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.5 pts

    On https://acibademinternational.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 58/100

    • 19 of 457 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at acibademinternational.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at acibademinternational.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.4 pts

    On https://acibademinternational.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 42/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://acibademinternational.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://acibademinternational.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://acibademinternational.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3390 words, 42 paragraphs, 14 lists, 45 images (45 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 4 question headings. 9 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: MedicalOrganization, WebSite, WebPage, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 12 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 18, H3: 15. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 7 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("acibadem-beyaz-logo (2)", "Acibadem", "Acibadem").
    • 23 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 53/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3269ms). 9 render-blocking resources. 2869 elements for 3390 words

    • Server response was slow (3269ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 8 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 58/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 19 placeholder links

    • 19 of 457 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at acibademinternational.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 65/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    18 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 86/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 78/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 37 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 3 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 36/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 254 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 96/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 96/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3390 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Medical Devices sites

Other Medical Devices sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.