Kuroma Kuroma

snov.io scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

snov.io is a CRM / Sales Enablement site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is AI Readiness (43); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://snov.io

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 9/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is snov.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: snov.io scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 88
Authority Signals 25% of the score 78
AI Readiness 30% of the score 43

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.9 pts

    On https://snov.io · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 9/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://snov.io · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4 pts

    On https://snov.io · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 21/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.4 pts

    On https://snov.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 25/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.2 pts

    On https://snov.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 58/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 87/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1065 words, 98 paragraphs, 19 lists, 133 images (133 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 9/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 99/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 13. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 38/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 112 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Clay icon", "Browser image", "Google logo").
    • 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 133 images but only ~1065 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 91/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 1802 elements for 1065 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 89 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 147 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 70/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 10 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 92/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 63/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 19 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 58/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 6 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 21/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 86 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 48/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 48/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1065 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited CRM / Sales Enablement sites

Other CRM / Sales Enablement sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.