getaccept.com scores 71/100 for AI Readiness
GetAccept (getaccept.com) is a CRM / Sales Enablement site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 71/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (78) and its weakest is On-Page Content (62); the biggest single gap is Media Accessibility at 26/100 (43 of 125 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://getaccept.com
The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 38/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 4 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is getaccept.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: getaccept.com scores 71/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4 pts
On https://getaccept.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 38/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts
On https://getaccept.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts
On https://getaccept.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts
On https://getaccept.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3 pts
On https://getaccept.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 42/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 2341 words, 209 paragraphs, 14 lists, 130 images (82 with alt text)
- 48 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 1 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebApplication, Organization, WebSite, WebPage, AggregateRating
-
3% of the overall score
Average 9 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 17, H3: 19. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 43 of 125 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 62 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("GetAccept Logo", "GetAccept Logo Icon", "sales_content_management").
- 37 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 125 images but only ~2341 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
7 render-blocking resources. 2576 elements for 2341 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 31 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 5 of 157 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
12 external links, 1 citation phrases, 13 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
14 of 37 headings open a quotable passage, 6 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 12 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 6/2/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
6 of 179 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 74/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
2341 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited CRM / Sales Enablement sites
- aisdr.com · 68/100
- snov.io · 63/100
- 企業データベース活用ならユーソナー (usonar.co.jp) · 62/100
Other CRM / Sales Enablement sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.