Kuroma Kuroma

yukes.co.jp scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

YUKE'S Co., Ltd. (yukes.co.jp) is a Gaming site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 43/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (72) and its weakest is Authority Signals (29); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 787 Gaming sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://yukes.co.jp

43/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 15/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Top 25% in Gaming Median 35 · Top quartile 40 · across 787 audited sites in Gaming

Is yukes.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: yukes.co.jp scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 45
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 72
Authority Signals 25% of the score 29
AI Readiness 30% of the score 34

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts

    On https://yukes.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://yukes.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://yukes.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.9 pts

    On https://yukes.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 16/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://yukes.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 74/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 333 words, 16 paragraphs, 18 lists, 3 images (3 with alt text)

    • Content length (333 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 94/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 59/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 70/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3018ms). 14 render-blocking resources. 306 elements for 333 words

    • Server response was slow (3018ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 14 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 63 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 16/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Fail 15/100

    9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 52/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (1)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 7 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 57/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/27/2024

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 19 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 67/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 67/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    333 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Gaming sites

Other Gaming sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.