Kuroma Kuroma

timebomb.co.jp scores 61/100 for AI Readiness

TIME BOMB RECORDS (timebomb.co.jp) is a Marketplace site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 61/100 (grade A), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (92) and its weakest is AI Readiness (51); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 14 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 177 Marketplace sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://timebomb.co.jp

61/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 10/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Marketplace Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 177 audited sites in Marketplace

Is timebomb.co.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: timebomb.co.jp scores 61/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 52
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 92
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 51

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.9 pts

    On https://timebomb.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 10/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://timebomb.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://timebomb.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 34/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://timebomb.co.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 14 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://timebomb.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 5,784 words, 81 paragraphs, 19 lists, 223 images (210 with alt text)

    • 13 images missing alt text (e.g. //timebomb.co.jp/cdn/shop/files/banner_36th.png?v=1789373029&width=2160, //timebomb.co.jp/cdn/shop/files/banner__36th_m_f62b466a-bf21-4b7c-843a-827a030f9c50.png?v=1789373069&width=750, //timebomb.co.jp/cdn/…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 10/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 14 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 36 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 74/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 12, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 13 of 223 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("レーベル LABEL").
    • 219 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 223 images but only ~5,784 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    9 render-blocking resources. 3,628 elements for 5,784 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 205 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 34/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    21 external links, 0 citation phrases, 80 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 73/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 21 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/14/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 38/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 374 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 7 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    5,784 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Marketplace sites

Other Marketplace sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.