Kuroma Kuroma

kaitori-daikichi.jp scores 69/100 for AI Readiness

kaitori-daikichi.jp is a Marketplace site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (53); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 28/100 (No author attribution found). That places it in the top quartile of the 177 Marketplace sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://kaitori-daikichi.jp

69/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Marketplace Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 177 audited sites in Marketplace

Is kaitori-daikichi.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: kaitori-daikichi.jp scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 77
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 53
AI Readiness 30% of the score 67

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On https://kaitori-daikichi.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 28/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://kaitori-daikichi.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3 pts

    On https://kaitori-daikichi.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 60/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +2.7 pts

    On https://kaitori-daikichi.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 70/100

    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +2.6 pts

    On https://kaitori-daikichi.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 49/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 5085 words, 283 paragraphs, 112 lists, 253 images (203 with alt text)

    • 50 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 65/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Partial 53/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 9 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 23, H3: 42. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 45/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 50 of 253 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 55 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("店舗買取", "出張買取", "金　インゴット").
    • 211 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 253 images but only ~5085 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    12 render-blocking resources. 3304 elements for 5085 words

    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 43 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 46 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 46 of 493 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 28/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    11 external links, 0 citation phrases, 73 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 67/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    38 of 68 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 60/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 49/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 371 passages carry a figure, 8 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    5085 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Marketplace · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai