Kuroma Kuroma

ocglobal.jp scores 59/100 for AI Readiness

OC Global (ocglobal.jp) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 59/100 (grade A), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is On-Page Content (41); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://ocglobal.jp

59/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is ocglobal.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: ocglobal.jp scores 59/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 41
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 87
Authority Signals 25% of the score 54
AI Readiness 30% of the score 58

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://ocglobal.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://ocglobal.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 14 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +4.5 pts

    On https://ocglobal.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 50/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.4 pts

    On https://ocglobal.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 37/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://ocglobal.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 6,332 words, 143 paragraphs, 18 lists, 97 images (15 with alt text)

    • 82 images missing alt text (e.g. //ocglobal.jp/wpdata/wp-content/plugins/revslider/sr6/assets/assets/dummy.png, //ocglobal.jp/wpdata/wp-content/plugins/revslider/sr6/assets/assets/dummy.png, //ocglobal.jp/wpdata/wp-content/plugins/revslide…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 14 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 49 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 46/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 8, H2: 6, H3: 8. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (8) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 35/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 82 of 97 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Logo", "Logo", "Logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("mobile_substation", "qode-eliptic-slider", "qode-eliptic-slider").
    • 78 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    100 render-blocking resources. 3,971 elements for 6,332 words

    • 100 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 58 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 88/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 37/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 12 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (3)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 53/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 26 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 57/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 12/17/2024

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 70/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    31 of 488 passages carry a figure, 12 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 52/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 52/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    6,332 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Consulting / Professional Services sites

Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.