Kuroma Kuroma

hd.funaisoken.co.jp scores 59/100 for AI Readiness

船井総研ホールディングス (hd.funaisoken.co.jp) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 59/100 (grade A), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is AI Readiness (53); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 6/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://hd.funaisoken.co.jp

59/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 6/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.1 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is hd.funaisoken.co.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: hd.funaisoken.co.jp scores 59/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 57
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 58
AI Readiness 30% of the score 53

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://hd.funaisoken.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts

    On https://hd.funaisoken.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.4 pts

    On https://hd.funaisoken.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 42/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.3 pts

    On https://hd.funaisoken.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 16/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://hd.funaisoken.co.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 33 of 217 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 80 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 95/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,601 words, 139 paragraphs, 46 lists, 103 images (102 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. //hd.funaisoken.co.jp/cdn/shop/t/5/assets/icon_blank.svg?v=91060644596835696471779966763)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Partial 51/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 10. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 103 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 19 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("icon", "icon", "icon") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 64 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("arrow", "arrow", "arrow").
    • 20 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 1,209 elements for 1,601 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 4 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 33 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 33 of 217 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 59/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 11/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    19 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 62/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 22 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 69/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/3/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 16/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 92 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 66/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 66/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,601 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Consulting / Professional Services sites

Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.