Kuroma Kuroma

mindmelt.jp scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

Mind Melt (mindmelt.jp) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (85) and its weakest is AI Readiness (58); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://mindmelt.jp

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.7% of the total, which takes 6.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 45 days ago

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is mindmelt.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: mindmelt.jp scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 65
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 85
Authority Signals 25% of the score 67
AI Readiness 30% of the score 58

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +6.7 pts

    On https://mindmelt.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://mindmelt.jp · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.9 pts

    On https://mindmelt.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 44/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +2.3 pts

    On https://mindmelt.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 75/100

    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +2 pts

    On https://mindmelt.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 78/100

    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 94/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 1682 words, 80 paragraphs, 3 lists, 20 images (20 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 12 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, ProfessionalService, WebSite, ItemList, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 17. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 8 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Mind Melt", "Toon Boom", "Clear Path").
    • 6 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 610 elements for 1682 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • 8 of 84 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 44/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 4 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 78/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 81/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    19 of 26 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 78/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 2 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 65/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 115 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 73/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 73/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Consulting / Professional Services sites

Other Consulting / Professional Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.