Kuroma Kuroma

stocktwits.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

Stocktwits (stocktwits.com) is a Wealth Management / Investment site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is On-Page Content (55); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 214 Wealth Management / Investment sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://stocktwits.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Answer Box Potential: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 7.2% of the total, which takes 4.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Wealth Management / Investment Median 39 · Top quartile 47 · across 214 audited sites in Wealth Management / Investment

Is stocktwits.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: stocktwits.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Raw HTML Availability.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 55
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 71
AI Readiness 30% of the score 61

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4.2 pts

    On https://stocktwits.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 41/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://stocktwits.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.9 pts

    On https://stocktwits.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 48/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.4 pts

    On https://stocktwits.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 47/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.4 pts

    On https://stocktwits.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 52/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2657 words, 79 paragraphs, 9 lists, 141 images (58 with alt text)

    • 83 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 47/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 64/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 72/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 4, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 19/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 76 of 134 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 55 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("App Store", "Google Play", "DIA").
    • 81 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 134 images but only ~2657 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 70/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 26/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (138368ms). 28 render-blocking resources. 4920 elements for 2657 words

    • Server response was slow (138368ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 28 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 67/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 94/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 22 placeholder links

    • 22 of 245 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Applebot-Extended, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 52/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Pass 80/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 2 citation phrases, 135 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 41/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 11 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 48/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 60 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 95/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    16 of 78 passages carry a figure, 6 set two figures against each other, 5 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Wealth Management / Investment sites

Other Wealth Management / Investment sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.