Kuroma Kuroma

tradingview.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

TradingView (tradingview.com) is a Wealth Management / Investment site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (85) and its weakest is On-Page Content (53); the biggest single gap is Media Accessibility at 12/100 (118 of 163 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.). That places it in the top quartile of the 105 FinTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://tradingview.com

66/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in FinTech Median 51 · Top quartile 56 · across 105 audited sites in FinTech

Is tradingview.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: tradingview.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 85
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 73

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.2 pts

    On https://tradingview.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 40/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://tradingview.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://tradingview.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.7 pts

    On https://tradingview.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 48/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 1 of your 31 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.6 pts

    On https://tradingview.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 45/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 87/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3790 words, 11 paragraphs, 26 lists, 246 images (45 with alt text)

    • 201 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), static.tradingview.com, static.tradingview.com)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 45/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 15 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 22. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Fail 12/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 118 of 163 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 45 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("BITSTAMP:BTCUSD", "INDEX:BTCUSD", "NASDAQ:NVDA").
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 163 images but only ~3790 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    141 render-blocking resources. 6732 elements for 3790 words

    • 141 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 90/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 62 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 89/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 40/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    11 external links, 0 citation phrases, 86 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 69/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (6)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 48/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 31 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 65/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 28 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 95/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    23 of 98 passages carry a figure, 16 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3790 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Wealth Management / Investment · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai