Kuroma Kuroma

tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp is a food service site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 46/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (77) and its weakest is Authority Signals (36); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 4,199 Food & Hospitality sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp

46/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Food & Hospitality Median 38 · Top quartile 43 · across 4,199 audited sites in Food & Hospitality

Is tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 40
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 36
AI Readiness 30% of the score 38

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://tokyo-ichiban-foods.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 57/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 299 words, 7 paragraphs, 15 lists, 41 images (20 with alt text)

    • Content length (299 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 21 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/img/common/ph_submenu_kodawari_1.jpg, /assets/img/common/ph_submenu_kodawari_2.jpg, /assets/img/common/ph_submenu_kodawari_3.jpg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 68/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 4, H3: 2. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 34/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 21 of 41 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("とらふぐ亭", "WOKUNI", "長崎ファーム").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 41 images but only ~299 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    17 render-blocking resources. 413 elements for 299 words

    • 17 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 3 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 77 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 6 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 59/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/6/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 23 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 55/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 55/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    299 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited food service sites

Other food service sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.