Kuroma Kuroma

jp.marugame.com scores 55/100 for AI Readiness

jp.marugame.com is a food service site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 55/100 (grade B), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (85) and its weakest is Authority Signals (37); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 4,199 Food & Hospitality sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://jp.marugame.com

55/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 23/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 5.4 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Food & Hospitality Median 38 · Top quartile 43 · across 4,199 audited sites in Food & Hospitality

Is jp.marugame.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: jp.marugame.com scores 55/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 54
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 85
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 50

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.4 pts

    On https://jp.marugame.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 23/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +5.3 pts

    On https://jp.marugame.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 41/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://jp.marugame.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://jp.marugame.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.4 pts

    On https://jp.marugame.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 32/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,421 words, 71 paragraphs, 21 lists, 41 images (26 with alt text)

    • 15 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 32/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Restaurant

  • AI Readability Score Partial 67/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 88/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 25. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 41 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Image of udon", "Image of tempura").
    • 39 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 41 images but only ~1,421 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    40 render-blocking resources. 1,687 elements for 1,421 words

    • 40 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 41 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 23/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    22 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 41/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 68/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 35 headings open a quotable passage, 5 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 69/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/15/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 15/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 106 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 74/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 74/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited food service sites

Other food service sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.