Kuroma Kuroma

majangdong-gj.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness

경주 마장동숯불구이 (majangdong-gj.com) is a Restaurant Tech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is AI Readiness (79) and its weakest is Authority Signals (53); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 16/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Restaurant, FAQPage, WebSite, WebPage, Person, Organization). That places it in the top quartile of the 439 Restaurant Tech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://majangdong-gj.com

69/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 55/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 4.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Restaurant Tech Median 37 · Top quartile 41 · across 439 audited sites in Restaurant Tech

Is majangdong-gj.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: majangdong-gj.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 69
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 53
AI Readiness 30% of the score 79

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://majangdong-gj.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +4.1 pts

    On https://majangdong-gj.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 54/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts

    On https://majangdong-gj.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.8 pts

    On https://majangdong-gj.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 71/100

    • 9 of 41 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • This page opens 12 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://majangdong-gj.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 48/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1664 words, 62 paragraphs, 3 lists, 32 images (31 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. images/stamp.svg)
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • 4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Restaurant, FAQPage, WebSite, WebPage, Person, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 55/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 32 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 30 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 17 image(s) load only via JavaScript (lazy/data-src), and most AI crawlers run no JavaScript and never see them.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 635 elements for 1664 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 41 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 48/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 9% of the overall score

    17 external links, 0 citation phrases, 11 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 54/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (1)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 59/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 100/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/17/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 64/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    9 of 118 passages carry a figure, 9 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 80/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1664 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Restaurant Tech sites

Other Restaurant Tech sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.