Kuroma
gasik.kr scores 79/100 for AI Readiness
대구 레스토랑 가식(佳食) (gasik.kr) is a Restaurant Tech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 79/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is AI Readiness (91) and its weakest is Authority Signals (57); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (7 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FoodEstablishment, Restaurant, FAQPage, HowTo, WebSite, Organization, WebPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 439 Restaurant Tech sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://gasik.kr
The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 42/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.1 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Restaurant Tech Median 37 · Top quartile 41 · across 439 audited sites in Restaurant Tech
Is gasik.kr ready for AI search?
Largely yes: gasik.kr scores 79/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.1 pts
On https://gasik.kr · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 42/100
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add Trust Signals up to +4 pts
On https://gasik.kr · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 56/100
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts
On https://gasik.kr · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.7 pts
On https://gasik.kr · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 79/100
- 31 of 191 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
- This page opens 78 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts
On https://gasik.kr · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 4998 words, 122 paragraphs, 7 lists, 12 images (12 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 44 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
7 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FoodEstablishment, Restaurant, FAQPage, HowTo, WebSite, Organization, WebPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
7 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
0 render-blocking resources. 1481 elements for 4998 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 12 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 31 placeholder links
- 31 of 191 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25. Has author
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
52 external links, 0 citation phrases, 131 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Testimonials, Social profiles (1)
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
9 of 19 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 1 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 6/15/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
48 of 375 passages carry a figure, 36 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 85/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
4998 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Restaurant Tech sites
- 경주 마장동숯불구이 (majangdong-gj.com) · 69/100
- Restaurant Technology (spoton.com) · 63/100
- 漢堡王首頁 (www.burgerking.com.tw) · 30/100
Other Restaurant Tech sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.