Kuroma Kuroma

pulumi.com scores 71/100 for AI Readiness

Pulumi (pulumi.com) is a Developer Tools / Platforms site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 71/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is On-Page Content (55); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 11/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 175 Developer Tools / Platforms sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://pulumi.com

71/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Developer Tools / Platforms Median 46 · Top quartile 52 · across 175 audited sites in Developer Tools / Platforms

Is pulumi.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: pulumi.com scores 71/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 55
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 77
AI Readiness 30% of the score 70

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.8 pts

    On https://pulumi.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 11/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://pulumi.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.8 pts

    On https://pulumi.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 25/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts

    On https://pulumi.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +2.1 pts

    On https://pulumi.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 71/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2459 words, 41 paragraphs, 20 lists, 205 images (203 with alt text)

    • 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /fingerprinted/images/home/home-hero-code-overlay.854c0abe9dc10d826bb9ac6e9c9503fa83deaf9319e2c03ac861b7a62c90884a.svg, /fingerprinted/images/footer/bg-lines.db941eef4575a29e90d71577c26c8d1247a92ba851a12ab20…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 11/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, Organization, Corporation, WebSite, SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Pass 89/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 11 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 8. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 183 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Pulumi logo", "Pulumi logo", "bmw logo").
    • 63 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 203 images but only ~2459 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 91/100

    2% of the overall score

    0 render-blocking resources. 2954 elements for 2459 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 8 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 86/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Pass 83/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    35 external links, 2 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 84/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 71/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 17 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 77/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    3 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 9 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/14/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 25/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 149 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2459 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Developer Tools / Platforms · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai