Kuroma Kuroma

live2d.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Live2D Cubism (live2d.com) is a Developer Tools / Platforms site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (76) and its weakest is Authority Signals (52); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 13/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 135 Developer Tools / Platforms sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://live2d.com

63/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Developer Tools / Platforms Median 43 · Top quartile 51 · across 135 audited sites in Developer Tools / Platforms

Is live2d.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: live2d.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 56
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 76
Authority Signals 25% of the score 52
AI Readiness 30% of the score 69

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.7 pts

    On https://live2d.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 13/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://live2d.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 26/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://live2d.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.7 pts

    On https://live2d.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 28/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.4 pts

    On https://live2d.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 24/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1701 words, 85 paragraphs, 23 lists, 63 images (59 with alt text)

    • 4 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 13/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 24/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 35/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 of 63 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 9 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("IMG", "IMG", "IMG") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 24 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Live2D Cubism", "Live2D Anniversary", "5.4 alpha").
    • 50 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3527ms). 26 render-blocking resources. 959 elements for 1701 words

    • Server response was slow (3527ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 26 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 86/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    31 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 68/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 60/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 7 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 84/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 28/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    9 of 169 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 56/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 56/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1701 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Developer Tools / Platforms · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai