Kuroma Kuroma

azul.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

Azul (azul.com) is a Developer Tools / Platforms site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (72) and its weakest is On-Page Content (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 10 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 135 Developer Tools / Platforms sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://azul.com

65/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Developer Tools / Platforms Median 43 · Top quartile 51 · across 135 audited sites in Developer Tools / Platforms

Is azul.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: azul.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 56
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 63
Authority Signals 25% of the score 72
AI Readiness 30% of the score 67

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://azul.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 189 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at azul.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at azul.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://azul.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 10 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4 pts

    On https://azul.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 44/100

    • 1 of your 17 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Expand Question Coverage up to +3.7 pts

    On https://azul.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 43/100

    • Add 5-10 question-based H2/H3 headings that mirror how users ask about this topic
    • Write a concise, direct answer under each question
    • Keep the questions in your FAQPage schema in sync with the on-page Q&A
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.7 pts

    On https://azul.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 47/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 93/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1443 words, 37 paragraphs, 10 lists, 91 images (81 with alt text)

    • 10 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 43/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 10 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 55/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 18 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 10 of 91 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 59 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Azul logo", "Ausgrid logo", "Priceline Logo").
    • 36 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 91 images but only ~1443 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 66/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3127ms). 2 render-blocking resources. 1595 elements for 1443 words

    • Server response was slow (3127ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 79 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 8 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 189 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at azul.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 47/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 80/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 1 citation phrases, 14 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 83/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 44/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 17 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    2 original data indicators, 11 percentages, 6 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/5/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 57/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    12 of 99 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 83/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 83/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1443 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Developer Tools / Platforms · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai