Kuroma
hireflutterdev.com scores 72/100 for AI Readiness
Hire Flutter Developers (hireflutterdev.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 72/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (83) and its weakest is Authority Signals (55); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 38/100 (4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, Service, LocalBusiness, HowTo, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://hireflutterdev.com
The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 40/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.2 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology
Is hireflutterdev.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: hireflutterdev.com scores 72/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.2 pts
On https://hireflutterdev.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 40/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://hireflutterdev.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts
On https://hireflutterdev.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add Trust Signals up to +2.9 pts
On https://hireflutterdev.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 68/100
- No privacy policy link found
- Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
-
Update Content Freshness up to +2.9 pts
On https://hireflutterdev.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 49/100
- Content appears to be over 6 months old
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 5359 words, 102 paragraphs, 6 lists, 1 tables, 2 images (2 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 12 question headings. 10 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, Service, LocalBusiness, HowTo, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 10 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 22, H3: 62. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("HireFlutterDev logo", "HireFlutterDev logo").
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
5 render-blocking resources. 1196 elements for 5359 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links
- 5 of 64 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
18 external links, 0 citation phrases, 87 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (1)
- No privacy policy link found
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
43 of 85 headings open a quotable passage, 7 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 22 percentages, 6 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 8/12/2025
- Content appears to be over 6 months old
-
5.1% of the overall score
30 of 251 passages carry a figure, 14 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 85/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
5359 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Technology sites
- Software Development Company (pharosproduction.com) · 88/100
- Neo Genesis (NeoGenesis) (neogenesis.app) · 75/100
- GetWidget (getwidget.dev) · 74/100
- PURIST (purist.online) · 74/100
- Hire Senior Python & AI Engineers (uvik.net) · 72/100
- enhancely.ai · 72/100
Other Technology sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.