Kuroma Kuroma

neogenesis.app scores 75/100 for AI Readiness

Neo Genesis (NeoGenesis) (neogenesis.app) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 75/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is On-Page Content (70); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 30/100 (9 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, Dataset, FAQPage, Article, HowTo, Service, ItemList). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://neogenesis.app

75/100
Grade
A+

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is neogenesis.app ready for AI search?

Largely yes: neogenesis.app scores 75/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 70
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 81
AI Readiness 30% of the score 70

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://neogenesis.app · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.7 pts

    On https://neogenesis.app · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100

    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.8 pts

    On https://neogenesis.app · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 71/100

    • 11 of 93 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • This page opens 26 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.7 pts

    On https://neogenesis.app · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 61/100

    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +2.7 pts

    On https://neogenesis.app · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 48/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 77/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 1958 words, 50 paragraphs, 3 lists, 2 tables

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    9 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, Dataset, FAQPage, Article, HowTo, Service, ItemList

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 5. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: data/listing page with no substantive media

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    9 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 945 elements for 1958 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 100/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 71/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • 11 of 93 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 61/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Pass 100/100

    9% of the overall score

    27 external links, 7 citation phrases, 10 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 78/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (1)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 97/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 17 headings open a quotable passage, 8 definitions, 3 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 82/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 48/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 138 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 100/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 100/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1958 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.