Kuroma Kuroma

getwidget.dev scores 74/100 for AI Readiness

GetWidget (getwidget.dev) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 74/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is Authority Signals (68); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://getwidget.dev

74/100
Grade
A+

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 50/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 3.8 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is getwidget.dev ready for AI search?

Largely yes: getwidget.dev scores 74/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Improve Raw HTML Availability and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 76
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 68
AI Readiness 30% of the score 73

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://getwidget.dev · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://getwidget.dev · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 48/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts

    On https://getwidget.dev · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://getwidget.dev · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.6 pts

    On https://getwidget.dev · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 80/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 9 of 135 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 40 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3594 words, 68 paragraphs, 20 lists, 5 images (5 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 78/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 2 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebPage, WebSite, AggregateOffer, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 13, H3: 38. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 70/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("GetWidget logo", "GetWidget logo", "GoodFirms").

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    0 render-blocking resources. 1813 elements for 3594 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 9 of 135 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 48/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 26 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 81/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 85/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    27 of 55 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 4 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 89/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 5/21/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 85/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    20 of 219 passages carry a figure, 7 set two figures against each other, 7 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.