Kuroma Kuroma

uvik.net scores 72/100 for AI Readiness

Hire Senior Python & AI Engineers (uvik.net) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 72/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is AI Readiness (65); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 22/100 (5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, ProfessionalService, Service, WebSite, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://uvik.net

72/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 40/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 4.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is uvik.net ready for AI search?

Largely yes: uvik.net scores 72/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve AI Readability Score.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 75
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 65

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://uvik.net · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://uvik.net · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.5 pts

    On https://uvik.net · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 22/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3 pts

    On https://uvik.net · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 42/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.9 pts

    On https://uvik.net · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 58/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3164 words, 48 paragraphs, 33 lists, 1 tables, 51 images (51 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 7 question headings. 10 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, ProfessionalService, Service, WebSite, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 28/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 21 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 24. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 69/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Hire engineers", "Markets", "Career").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 1452 elements for 3164 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 6 placeholder links

    • 6 of 167 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 58/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    27 external links, 0 citation phrases, 12 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 92/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 85/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 35 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 10 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/3/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 186 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 45/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 45/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3164 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.