Kuroma Kuroma

mdlive.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

mdlive.com is a Digital Health / Health Tech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (72) and its weakest is AI Readiness (49); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 19 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 128 Digital Health / Health Tech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://mdlive.com

64/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Digital Health / Health Tech Median 45.5 · Top quartile 54 · across 128 audited sites in Digital Health / Health Tech

Is mdlive.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: mdlive.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 72
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 70
Authority Signals 25% of the score 71
AI Readiness 30% of the score 49

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://mdlive.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://mdlive.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 19 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://mdlive.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://mdlive.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 31 of 138 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 60 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.6 pts

    On https://mdlive.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 29/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3187 words, 81 paragraphs, 24 lists, 27 images (27 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 3 question headings. 10 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 19 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 82/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 17 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 20, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 62/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Cigna healthcare", "Humana Logo", "woman thinking").
    • 13 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3096ms). 4 render-blocking resources. 1234 elements for 3187 words

    • Server response was slow (3096ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 31 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 31 of 138 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 51/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 13 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 88/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 78/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 30 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 29/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    8 of 139 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 74/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 74/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3187 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Digital Health / Health Tech · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai