Kuroma Kuroma

takasu.co.jp scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

【公式】高須クリニック｜美容整形や美容外科 (takasu.co.jp) is a Digital Health / Health Tech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is Authority Signals (37); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 0/100 (No author attribution found). That places it in the top quartile of the 128 Digital Health / Health Tech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://takasu.co.jp

63/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Digital Health / Health Tech Median 45.5 · Top quartile 54 · across 128 audited sites in Digital Health / Health Tech

Is takasu.co.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: takasu.co.jp scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 63
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 72

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://takasu.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.8 pts

    On https://takasu.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 26/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://takasu.co.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 47/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://takasu.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.7 pts

    On https://takasu.co.jp · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 49/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 25 of your 69 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3416 words, 207 paragraphs, 59 lists, 209 images (206 with alt text)

    • 3 images missing alt text (e.g. /common/images/header/icon_menu_bar_sp2.svg, /img/img_doctor.webp, /img/img_doctor_sp.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 26/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, MedicalClinic, Thing

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 16 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 68/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 14, H3: 50. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 209 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 74 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("LANGUAGE", "←", "→").
    • 155 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 209 images but only ~3416 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 2215 elements for 3416 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 84/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 10 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 10 of 416 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    26 external links, 0 citation phrases, 55 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 47/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    25 of 69 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 100/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 63/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 4/19/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 63/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    16 of 226 passages carry a figure, 16 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3416 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Digital Health / Health Tech · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai