Kuroma Kuroma

edh.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 57/100

早安健康-每天都做得到的健康！ (edh.tw) 是 Digital Health / Health Tech 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 57/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（81 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（42 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Answer Box Potential，0/100（No passage an assistant could quote whole）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 3006 個 Media & Entertainment 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://edh.tw

57/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Top 25% in Media & Entertainment Median 37 · Top quartile 43 · across 3006 audited sites in Media & Entertainment

edh.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：edh.tw 的實測分數為 57/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 65
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 49
AI Readiness 30% of the score 42

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +7.2 pts

    On https://edh.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://edh.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.7 pts

    On https://edh.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 8/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts

    On https://edh.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://edh.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 60/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 94/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1535 words, 16 paragraphs, 8 lists, 62 images (59 with alt text)

    • 3 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 74/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 7 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 57/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 9, H3: 36. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Partial 53/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 62 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("早安健康", "Amino L40").
    • 59 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 1115 elements for 1535 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 62 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 78/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    23 external links, 1 citation phrases, 11 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 60/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 45 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 60/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 8/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 103 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 55/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 55/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1535 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Digital Health / Health Tech · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai